Today's Date is:
Full Disclosure Network tm
Syndicate our programs!
 


VIDEO BLOGS
DESKTOP VIDEOS
BLOG RELEASES
PROGRAM GUIDE
BUY OUR PROGRAMS

SUBSCRIBE
SYNDICATE WITH RSS
SEARCH
Radio on the Web
TV Channel Guide

Court Corruption
Will LAUSD Survive?
Feds Nail OC Sheriff: Justice or Abuse?
Belmont & School Construction
CUSD Recall
Gangs
Valdemar/Gangs
Religion and Politics
Gun Issues
Historic California Recall
Immigration Policies
Media Ethics
Politics vs Terrorism
The Prosecutor & the Presidency
Re-appointment of LAPD Chief

Voter Fraud
Illegal Immigration
Political Corruption
War On Terrorism
Police Politics
Rule of Law
Border Security
Government Accountability
International Issues

Attorney General
District Attorney
Sheriff & Chief of Police
Mayor
Special Interest Groups
Education

Top Shows from our Archives

About Us
2001 Emmy Winner

Contact Us

Subscirbe to our news letter
Email:
Subscribe Unsubscribe
Privacy Policy
Broadcasting of television, video and radio programs via a global computer network.
Did L A Times Miss the Mark?
On Judicial Bias & Richard Fine?

Internet exclusive Full Disclosure® Video News Preview
Release Date: June 14, 2009
Time: 28:30 min.

Bookmark and Share

Los Angeles, CA As a part of an on-going series entitled “Judicial Benefits & Court Corruption”, the Full Disclosure Network® presents the fifth segment, on line, in it’s entirety, for Internet viewers. The half-hour program will also be featured on over 40cable television systems in California, Washington D.C., Massachusetts, Wisconsin, Arizona and more.

NEWSPAPER SLANTED?
A June 7, 2009 Los Angeles Times article entitled “LAWYER TAKES A STAND FROM HIS CELL” provoked response and criticism from supporters of jailed Anti-Trust Attorney Richard I. Fine who is being held in civil contempt of court for over 100 days following his attempt to disqualify L. A. Superior Court Judge David Yaffe from hearing a case where Fine contends he was biased. Featured in the video are taking the L. A. Times to task, is Fred Sottile, John Rizzo

JUDICIAL BIAS?
Providing background and perspective on the issue of judicial bias and the recent U. S. Supreme Court ruling in Caperton vs Massey is prominent Appellate Court Attorney, Robert S. Gerstein, Ph.D. who is an Emeritus Professor in Political Science at UCLA. He describes the recent case that overturned a West Virginia Supreme Court decision where one of the Justices had received a $3 million campaign contribution from one of the parties in the case and who went on to cast the deciding vote in favor of Massey the contributor.

At the end of the video viewers are asked to respond and leave their comments online or to a 1-800-867-7777 number regarding the practice of Judges receiving payments or contributions from interested parties in litigation before them.



Your name:

Your location:

Your comments:


Please type the code you see in the image
in the box below. (case sensitive)


Credit card Phone Orders and Donations accepted :
please call 310-822-4449 or Email sales@fulldisclosure.net

Or please make a Tax Deductible Contribution to the
Full Disclosure Network®
A Non-Profit Tax Exempt 501 (c) (3) Educational organization

Donate

Comments to date: 42.  This is page 1 of 5.

Truth Seeker   Location unknown

Posted: 09:22 am [PST] on January 24 2010

@ Courtwatch. Please work with Leslie Dutton on a report NAMING NAMES. We deserve the right to know the names of these Judges. All 2000 of them. We deserve the right to know, from top to bottom, who came up with the sudden SBX211 "Bill/Law" to make these payments legal. Every one of them.

It's extremely interesting that Marin County and San Diego County are now undergoing "audits" for Court Corruption, but Los Angeles, which is where THIS part of the corruption started has been left out. Los Angeles is the center of the septic system of Court Corruption, and the law makers as well. (Some who's spouses are Judges)

It appears that our Government is just really a large mafia. Why is Madoff in jail if these Judges aren't? They have done the exact same thing, but it's worse. He was at least caught, and stopped. There is no stopping the Government.

Leslie, please do a report, naming names of all the ones involved from top to bottom. Who drafted SBX 211, who supported it, and who is getting the payments. All 2000 names.

courtwatch   Marin County

Posted: 08:00 pm [PST] on January 21 2010

For those of you who are interested in the Richard Fine issues, the statistics about the judicial perks he was complaining about can be found in the Judicial Council's December 15, 2009 report entitled "Historical Analysis of Disparities in Judicial Benefits". The key statistics are in attachment D, pages D-9 to D-14. In 2008, CA counties paid a total of $30,388,289 in "supplemental judicial benefits" to their judges, above and beyond their state salaries and benefits.$23,482,932 of this total $30.3 million was paid by Los Angeles County, to Los Angeles County judges. The report does not state how much each judge receives per capita, but it states that Los Angeles County has 436 judges-- that comes out to each LA judge receiving approximately $53,860 from LA County. Richard Fine challenged the LA judges, stating that those receiving these hefty benefits from LA County should not be hearing cases involving LA County. He also claimed the payments were illegal. In 2008, a court of appeal agreed that the payments were illegal.(Sturgeon v. County of Los Angeles (2008) 167 Cal.App.4th 630.) According to the Judicial Council report (page 4), in response to the Sturgeon case, "the judicial branch sought legislation, Senate Bill X2 11".

The legislation, commonly known as SBX 211, was pushed through on an emergency basis. It allows judges to continue to receive these extra benefits, and also provides RETROACTIVE IMMUNITY from prosecution to counties paying the benefits, and judges receiving the benefits.

In other words, CA judges were taking the county benefits in violation of the law. When this was made public, the CA judiciary got emergency legislation passed, allowing them to continue to receive their benefits (while courts are being closed due to "budget constraints"), and also allowing them to escape prosecution. Meanwhile, the lawyer who had been challenging the LA bench for taking these hefty illegal perks for years, was disbarred and sent to jail, where he has been held in solitary confinement for almost a year.

The legality of SBX 211 has subsequently been challenged -- something the language of the legislation itself anticipated.

If you think this report on judicial benefits is interesting, check out the report issued the same day (12/15/09), by the CA Judicial Council's "Commission on Impartial Courts" recommending that judges be allowed to take campaign contributions from those who appear before them (although 75% of the public, and over 25% of judges, believe such contributions affect the outcome of cases), and also recommending AGAINST the implementation of Judicial Performance Evaluations--which consultants to the Judicial Council have repeatedly,strongly recommended.

Justice   NorCal

Posted: 12:21 am [PST] on December 27 2009

Another example of questionable law enforcement..go to JuryUninformed.blogspot.com. Read about special treatment apparently affored the former mayor/retired county sheriff deputy's, known, troubled son in Pleasant Hill.

Jun Kim   Michigan

Posted: 01:10 am [PST] on December 20 2009

It is crystal clear, Subject Judge’s fraud, directly related to misconduct order that “no evidence”; I believe that lobbyist beyond this case with political party.

How possible no evidence; Respondents state that “ He has never been moved from the Pending to the Waiting List” “ I have been carrying him on our Pending List every month since December 2005”.
U.S Suprem court refused of the review. How posible justice please let me know
H

Joe Banana   so. cal

Posted: 05:03 am [PST] on November 15 2009

How does the reversal in the Caperton vs Massey ruling effect this situation?

joebanana   so. cal

Posted: 05:42 pm [PST] on October 19 2009

It's the Sheriffs duty to arrest anyone, and everyone involved in this criminality. Lee Baca is ignoring this proven criminal activity, he needs to man up, and do his job. What the hell is with "law enforcement", they're so used to busting pot smokers, that real criminals scare them? Baca aint a "sheriff", he's a sissy.

pilgrim1776   michigan 48375

Posted: 12:26 pm [PST] on October 01 2009

The entire system is corrupt and needs to be removed. However, the masses-r-asses have been so dumbed-down that unless they can clear their minds to see what is wrong, nothing will be done.

Eve Watson   San Diego, CA

Posted: 09:44 pm [PST] on September 29 2009

We don't have to wonder what's wrong with the USA: greed, at every level. Get mine while I can and to ____ with the everyone else.
We get what we deserve, unfortunately.

Elizabeth Wallace   Oregon

Posted: 08:24 am [PST] on September 15 2009

excellent and it took J.A.I.L. to get me to investigate this and find you I would like a copy of this in full to present to the Oregon groups please contact me firefly@ados.net

sally Fleer   thousand oaks

Posted: 06:51 am [PST] on September 15 2009

Once again. Who ido we trrus?????
Not many. Cheating looks like the norm these days.

next 10
 

Full Disclosure Network®is a registered trademark of the American Association of Women and an electronic media and television production of the
Citizens Protection Alliance,
a 501(c)(3) tax exempt educational organization.

2009 © All Rights Reserved. Full Disclosure Network®
337 Washington Blvd., Suite #1, Marina del Rey, CA 90292
Tel 310.822.4449 Fax: 310.919.2890

 

Site Meter