This is a preview from the second half of a one-hour expose entitled “Judicial Revenge” and The Private Attorney General  against former Richard I. Fine” who without being charged with a crime or convicted was held in L A County Men’s Central Jail. in solitary “Coercive Confinement” for 18 months..  This 72 year-old former U. S. Attorney exposed government corruption all the way up the  U. S. Supreme Court when  fighting to win his freedom and now to restore his law license that was taken from him by the judges who retaliated when exposed them in  court filings.  This is a story of how whistle blowers are treated in the United States of America in 2011.

Program Preview:

Segment #1: Private Attorney General Richard I. Fine 

In an effort to fight government corruption, Richard I. Fine began specializing in public interest law and became known as “the” Private Attorney General. When citizens groups were being victimized by corrupt government policies, Richard Fine would represent them against government agencies. This specialization led to his eventual disbarment when he challenged the Superior Court Judges for taking illegal payments from the County and then sitting on cases where the County was a party to the case, a clear conflict with the law and Judicial Canons of Ethics, but ignored by all the Judges.

Segment #2: Conflicted Justices Of 9th Circuit Court Of Appeals

L. A. County Sheriff Baca was respondent in the case involving Richard I. Fine whose Writ of Habeas Corpus was filed in the 9th Circuit Court of Appeal in 2009. According to court filings by Richard Fine, all three justices assigned to the case had ties to Los Angeles power players who were involved in conflict and questionable practices. While he remained in solitary “coercive confinement” for 18 months, California Judges inexplicably denied, without hearing, his petition to be released from jail. Fine’s descriptions of the cast of characters, as stated in his court documents, paints a trail of intrigue starting from a big law firm with a County contract to negotiate leases in Marina del Rey. A partner in the firm was also President of the State Bar at the time Fine’s disbarment proceedings were underway. This occurred while Fine was suing one of the Marina lessees on behalf of homeowners. According to the California Judicial Council, 90% of the State Judges are receiving illegal payments from counties, but were given retroactive criminal immunity in Senate Bill SBX2 11 for taking the illegal payments and failing to report and to disclose to litigants in the courtroom of their conflict.

Segment #3: Attorneys Fear Judges Who Control The State Bar

According to Richard I. Fine, California lawyers are well aware of corruption in the Judiciary, but are afraid to challenge it. The State Bar is charged with disciplining attorneys but controlled by Supreme Court Judges. Recently the California State Bar has admitted in Court filings that Fine was disbarred for having challenged the judges. This raises the possibility that State Supreme Court Justices may be asked to disqualify themselves inasmuch as five of the Justices previously also received illegal payments from L A County, according to court documents filed by Richard I. Fine and the office County Auditor-Controller.

Full Disclosure Network® and The News Behind The News® are trademarks and DBAs of The American Association of Women, Inc., a nonprofit 501(c)(3) educational organization, EIN 95-3922910.

All content © 2019 The American Association of Women, Inc.